Can American’s have a lawsuit against all those who propagate the Man Made Global Warming Fraud?
Tuesday, December 15th, 2009 at
9:05 pm
Since the proclamation of man made global warming is a fraud and is not only going to cost us money and jobs, it also has been causing starvation in poor countries due to food being used for fuels. Would it be possible for American’s to get together and have a lawsuit against all those who created this fraud? The scientist who manipulated the data, the political officials like Obama and Gore, the UN, and any Corporate and Banking institutions involved?
Tagged with: banking institutions • fraud • global warming • gore • jobs • money • obama • political officials • poor countries • scientist • starvation
Filed under: Fraud Information
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Our elected officials are supposed to be looking out for our best interests and it’s up to them to sort out good science from bad and make policy decisions based on good information. There’s plenty of bad information out there and some of it, unfortunately, looks like good information on its face.
Blame the lack of good science education in this country on the inability of the public in general, and our elected officials in particular, to distinguish between good information and junk science.
I offer no opinion one way or the other about whether the theory of anthropic global warming is actually a fraud — I only say that people should learn how to sort out good science from bad.
You’d be more likely to see a lawsuit against those who stole the emails, then claimed they mean something they do not.
No
First, what justice would it serve? News Flash: starvation was around long before this global warming crap. Food is not the problem…it’s access to it that’s the issue.
What do you expect…everyone who believes it gives someone who doesn’t $50? Again…what’s the point?
This is a question that makes me wonder about the status of our great nation. Are our people getting dumber and dumber? More ignorant as time goes on? At any rate the answer your question is "If it feels good, then just do it and to hell with the consequences." Oh and btw, welcome to hell
Interesting idea. I happen to agree with you but do you expect to receive if you win the case? Free gasoline? A bushel of corn? Seriously, lawsuits aren’t free and to engage in one based upon principal alone is expensive/
It is not a fraud. The fact do exist, it’s just that they have been distorted to make the problem seem greater. The problem itself is still there, the earth IS heating up. What is missing (and this s why some of the data might have been tinkered with) is the causality between this observed warming and human activity. That was just never there, it was always a supposition.
The fact that governments all over the world chose to take actions that may have had costs associated s not something you can pin on the scientists. Those were political decisions, not scientific ones.
Besides, the USD has done almost nothing to fight climate change, so it would not be people from the US who had the claim, but those from countries that DID bring in plans to stop it.
Can everyone on Yahoo who had to read this question sue the poster for wasting their time?
you would have to make a case against Hundreds and Hundreds of scientific journal studies from almost all of the top scientific peer reviewed journals almost 20 years back…
and you make it sound like corporations and governments are only set to help global warming. who do you think funds the "research" and "talking points" that argue against it? "grass root scientist?" Other corporations etc that don’t want to have anything hurt thier bottom line…
1) Global Warming is real. Earth has natural warming cycles, but the emission of greenhouse gases by humans has caused this cycle to skyrocket. Watch unbiased news and read credible material that shows data from non-fringe scientists.
2) Let’s say that Global Warming is a fraud, and we create new solar/wind/etc. technology. In the short run it would cost us billions of dollars, but in the long run we would benefit both our economy and security. Think about it, no more bargaining for oil with corrupt dictators in the Middle East, we would become energy independent. Jobs building "green" infrastructure would be created.
3) To answer your question, NO.
4) This entire thing was probably a waste typing because you obviously are a tad biased on this issue.