Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, he was very selective of the investors who wanted to give him money, rejecting certain ones, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors) to see if his financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors) to see if his financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, he was very selective of the investors who wanted to give him money, rejecting certain ones, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

I have a question. There is this girl "Susie" who asked "Joe" to claim her son on his taxes ("Susie doesn’t have a job or a green card). The agreement was that when "Joe" received his tax return that he would give "Susie" some money so she could pay off court fees and other needs that she had to handle. "Joe" didn’t give "Susie" anything so now she claims she is going to file fraud charges and she is going to the IRS and say that someone claimed her child without her "knowledge" (but that is VERY untrue) (When "Joe" did his taxes "Susie" went with him and provided the s.s card of her child.) Can all of this be possible?

I have a large group of people at my federal agency that are drawing regular pay while going through medical procedures. I also have a handful of reports stating they are also working nonfederal positions; double dipping.

How could I run a search through the IRS to determine if they are comitting fraud?

Thanks

Ok here’s my question my husband’s ex wife owes over ,500 in back child support the last time she filed income tax we got it, that was about 6 years ago. Since then she went on SSD but she told me that ever since she quit working she allows someone else to claim her other 2 children for the EIC and they give her most of the money so me and my husband don’t get it (God forbid she actually take care of her kids) but anyhow would that be tax fraud on her part as well as the other person and how would we report it to the IRS? I have her SSN but not the 2 kids’ and I don’t know who the person claiming them is. But in the past she claimed them on her income tax return. So can I report her to the IRS without having to give mine or my husband’s name as if she found out it was us it would cause a big headache as she has some visitation of the kids. Thanks to all that took the time to read and answer me. Sorry for going on just wanted to give as much info as possible.
I know her other kids don’t qualify as dependents for someone else. They live with her and she collects all the welfare she can get for them.
The children she has someone else claim are not my husbands kids we have custody of the 2 they have together so he would not have access to anything with thier SSN.

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, he was very selective of the investors who wanted to give him money, rejecting certain ones, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

my x recently became a private investigator& has stolen my older sons income tax money.he didnt even have the w-2.he hasnt lived at home for 6 years& hes going to college&working 2 jobs.his dad is also a prison guard so, he doesnt think he can fight him on this. so, every year he keeps taking it.i wanna call the irs, he dont because, its his dad but, hes hurting my son emotionally& physically.is there anything you can do about identity theft?

My ID was lost several years ago. I’ve recently found out that it was used to file a false claim which has resulted in the IRS saying I them ,000 dollars. In order to resolve this I have to file a claim of ID theft about the matter. My problem is that I’m not sure wether or not I have a warrant for my arrest… What should I do?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, he was very selective of the investors who wanted to give him money, rejecting certain ones, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

1040 Checkmate!

DOJ Dismisses Felony Tax Prosecution
– With Prejudice — After PRA Defense Raised

Evidence OMB Complicit In Income Tax Fraud

DOJ & IRS Petitioned To Explain

On May 12, 2006 in Peoria, Illinois, the attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) begged the court to dismiss all charges against IRS victim Robert Lawrence in federal District Court.

The motion for dismissal came on the heels of a surprise tactic by Lawrence’s defense attorney Oscar Stilley.

The tactic threatened exposure of IRS’s on-going efforts to defraud the public. The move put DOJ attorneys in a state of panic that left them with only one alternative: beg for dismissal, with prejudice.

Stilley’s tactic paid off. Sixty days earlier, the DOJ had indicted Lawrence on three counts of willful failure to file a 1040 form, and three felony counts of income tax evasion. The federal Judge dismissed all charges with prejudice, meaning the DOJ cannot charge Lawrence with those crimes again.

The trial was to have started on Monday morning, May 15th.

On Wednesday, May 10, Stilley mailed a set of documents to the DOJ in response to DOJ’s discovery demands. The documents revealed to DOJ for the first time that Lawrence was basing his entire defense on an act of Congress, 44 U.S.C. 3500 – 3520, also known as the "Paperwork Reduction Act" (PRA).

In Section 3512 of the Act, titled "Public Protection," it says that no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with an agency’s collection of information request (such as a 1040 form), if the request does not display a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the Act, or if the agency fails to inform the person who is to respond to the collection of information that he is not required to respond to the collection of information request unless it displays a valid control number.

In Section 3512 Congress went on to authorize that the protection provided by Section 3512 may be raised in the form of a complete defense at any time during an agency’s administrative process (such as an IRS Tax Court or Collection and Due Process Hearing) or during a judicial proceeding (such as Lawrence’s criminal trial).

In sum, the PRA requires that all government agencies display valid OMB control numbers and certain disclosures directly on all information collection forms that the public is requested to file. Lawrence’s sole defense was he was not required to file an IRS Form 1040 because it displays an invalid OMB control number.

Government officials knew that if the case went to trial, it would expose the fraudulent, counterfeit 1040. They also must have known that a trial would expose the ongoing conspiracy between OMB and IRS to publish 1040 forms each year that those agencies knew were in violation of the PRA. That would raise the issue that the Form 1040, with its invalid control number, is being used by the Government to cover up the underlying constitutional tort — that is, the enforcement of a direct, unapportioned tax on the labor of every working man, women and child in America.

Any information collection form, such as IRS Form 1040, which lacks bona fide statutory authority or which conflicts with the Constitution, cannot be issued an OMB control number. If a control number were issued for such a form, the form would be invalid and of no force and effect.

Under the facts and circumstances of the last 24 years, it is safe to say that IRS Form 1040 is a fraudulent, counterfeit, bootleg form. Government officials responsible for this fraud should be investigated and face indictment for willfully making and sponsoring false instruments.

Caught between a rock and a hard place, the DOJ and IRS decided not to let the Lawrence case proceed because it would reveal one critical and damning fact:

The PRA law protects those that fail to file IRS bootleg Form 1040

The DOJ knew that it stood a significant chance of losing the case, and if that happened, the press and others would quickly spread the word, and leave only fools to ever file a 1040 again. Oscar Stilley’s pleadings and documents made these points quite clear:

* IRS Form 1040 violates the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and is therefore a legally invalid form.

* Under the Public Protection clause of the PRA, no person can be penalized for failing to file a 1040 if the IRS fails to fully comply with the PRA.

* The PRA statutes explicitly provide that a PRA challenge is a complete defense and can be raised in any administrative or judicial proceeding.

* The IRS Individual Form 1040 has not and cannot comply with the requirements of the PRA because no existing statute authorizes the IRS to impose or collect the federal income tax from individuals. That lack of bona fide authority makes it impossible for IRS to avoid violating the PRA.

We The People Foundation has researched the facts, law and circumstances surrounding this case, and has determined that:

* A public trial would have opened a “Pandora’s Box” of legal evidence and government testimony under oath that would establish the IRS 1040 form as both fraudulent and counterfeit.

* Oscar Stilley’s PRA defense “checkmated” the DOJ and IRS

* The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) appears to have been complicit with IRS in deceiving the public and in helping perpetuate the 1040 fraud by promulgating federal regulations that negate the plain language of the PRA laws passed by Congress and by allowing the IRS to continually skirt the explicit requirements of those statutes

Accordingly, We The People Foundation has petitioned the U.S. Attorney General, the IRS Commissioner, and Director of the OMB, requesting an official explanation of their conduct in Peoria.

See the petition below. It includes links to all relevant statutes, regulations, court decisions, Federal Register publications, law review articles, Lawrence case pleadings, and the discovery documents sent by defense counsel Stilley to the DOJ.
Delete

Okay so I made about ,000 trading stocks this past year. The way that works is when you sell the stock, you deduct the price you bought it from and whatever is left over is your profit (or loss).

I just lost about ,000 of it on this one stock that went plummeted drastically, but a lot of people are speculating that it will probably go back up, because it doesn’t make sense for it to be this low. The problem is the year is almost over, and if I don’t sell the stock so I can record the loss, I’ll have to pay taxes on the ,000 I made. And if the stock doesn’t go back up, there’s no way I’ll be able to come up with the money for that. So it kind of looks like I should sell the stock.

But I don’t want to sell the stock, because I and a lot of other people are hoping it will go back up. So it kind of looks like I should sell the stock so I can record a loss (just in case it doesn’t go back up), and then buy the shares back because I’m hoping they’ll go back up. But that kind of sounds like I’m bordering on tax fraud. Will the IRS come after me for tax fraud if I do that?

My sons marriage is on the Rocks. They separated after filing a joint Federal return. He told her when the refund check arrived to call him and he’d endorse it and split the money with her, which seemed fair since it was all based on his income because she hadn’t worked. She had a better idea, forge his name and keep all the money.
In SC forgery is a felony, not to mention it was a Federal check. Now he’s just trying to get a copy of the check back from the IRS to see how and where she cashed it. Are spouses immune to committing fraud on a partner? If he’d signed someone elses name on a check, he’d be in jail already. The local cops have told him the best he might get is his day in family court, for a Federal Check? Awe come on now!
Is this for real? It doesn’t sound right.

My friend wants to turn himself in for substantial understating of income for 2006-2007. It a lot of money. Three figures but not over 0K.
He is a recovering alcoholic who wants to make good. A tax lawyer said the IRS probably will not charge him the 75% penalty and it will not be considered fraud. What do you think?
I think he said it was rental income..no 1099 filed.
he has never been audited.

i know some one that committed tax fraud,and they were turned into the irs ,they claimed a child when they were told not to and they did it anyway,when they did not take care of the child,the mother did not have the child ,signed over to the grand parents ,who get the money?

Bush had massively cut auditors in the IRS that specialized in going after Corporate tax fraud and the wealthiest tax-payers. I haven’t read anything about this subject yet…Have you?

I am raising a siblings child due to the mother not being metaly stable. The mother is receiving disability and also receives reduced rent. The mother is working as a stripper for cash tips, none of what is reported to the IRS. I estimate she is making over 1000.00 per week. We receive no support from her for her son because she claims no income. I have reported the fraud to the national Inspector Generals Office months ago but have gotten no resolve. Any ideas on how to peak someones intrest in investigating this??

I took an extended break from a business I own stock in because of illness. Upon my return, I discovered what I am sure is multiple dishonest acts committed by a former partner. This partner was forced out of the business because of multiple problems; however, payroll fraud was never suspected. He took (stole) many of the records upon departure so I had the bank send copies of all checks written during the time period in question. AFter looking, I know something is wrong but cant put my finger on it. I think he was "creating" employees by using ss numbers off employment applications (yes, I know, that should not have even been asked on an employment app). I have gotten the W2s together, many of which were returned undeliverable, and am creating folders for each in which I am filing copies of paychecks. I then plan to start comparing endorsements looking for inconsistencies – PLEASE tell me where to go next – I’m kind of flying blind – so many records are destroyed like customer files that would make things easier – our tax burden is tremendous and I know wayyyyyyy inflated; but, the IRS will collect from whomevers got the money and that will be my 77 year old father (just his life’s work and savings) because the former partner is broke (naturally). We are tapped completely so I’ve got to be the one to do this – Could sure use any help out there. Thanks so much and God Bless.

Help with child custody and medi cal fraud and tax evasion?
I’m going through a child custody battle and my son’s mother is trying to take my son from me. I have a few questions, because if I can prove that she is a liar then I may have a good shot of having my son. Due to the fact she is saying so many mean things about me which are blatant lies.

Anyhow, My son’s mom applied for medical and wick and was approved, She did not disclose her assets e.g. 0k house, her 20k car that she paid cash for, nor did she mention any source of income. Isn’t this fraud? She obviously can afford to pay a 3500 mortgage payment, but can’t pay for the delivery. FYI, I found out she’s a prostitute so that’s why were not together.

Just last month she wanted to collect child support from me, but on her FL150 income and asset form, she said she does not work but has 1500 in expenses, Plus did not mention anything about her house, property taxes (which total 3500month) nor her paid off car 20k value, even though it clearly states if you lie it’s Perjury.

Here is what is weird, she called up wanted to close the case, but child support services said she can not close it because I was the one who opened it. Why would she have wanted to close it? Fishy?

Also if she has been paying an average of 50k annually towards her house, (I do have her loan documents and trust deed) for the past three years, isn’t she suppose to report this to the IRS. Report her source of income, even if its under table. I ask because she has not did her taxes for 3 years but owns a house and is obligated to pay for it.

So what can happen to her? Who should I report her to? She is obviously doing wrong and now trying to take my son away from me. And she may be feeling the heat by trying to close the child support case. What do you think???

my ex and i have divorce papers that say he can claim his son every other year. well he hasnt paid child support for 9 months or paid medical as per our divorce papers for 8 years. so I filed my son. why not , he doesnt follow the decree why should I ? besides I told him child support would of grabbed the whole thing. he said pay him 2300. or he’s having the irs get me for tax fraud? anyone lawyers or anyone gone thru this> wa state
no idiot men need reply. or deadbeat dads.
tx, but i already filed, and got my money, which he actually owes more in child support then what he would of got back, so i will tell the court to take off the child support amount. then he will still owe me. and its not tax fraud right?

I’ve have been hearing more and more stories lately about people who find out that 10+ (I’ve heard it going up to as many as 80 people using the stolen information) illegal immigrants have been using the person’s name and social security number after the IRS comes after them for back taxes! Is there a way to track your social to see where it is being used, looked at, reviewed, etc? What other ways can you track your identity?

My grandmother was named the personal representative of my father who died in 1992. I was a child when he died that is why she was named the PR. My sister and I are the only heirs to the estate.She lied to us and told us there was no money left and basically tried to scare us of from ever calling her again.
Anyways last year I found out she has been basically stealing the money from us all of these years.
This week I found out that while the estate was briefly closed for 2 years she received dividend payments from my dad’s stock She received about 8 thousand dollars in dividend payments and the checks were made out to her name – not the estate of my father. She hid this money from the court, from us AND FROM the IRS. I was looking for hard evidence because I want to start a criminal case against her.We are also trying to remove her as PR and need a concrete reason. My gut tells me this is theft and fraud. Can anyone confirm this?
Is this the concrete evidence I need?
Thanks!
Oh I also have the check numbers amounts and dates. The accountant at my dad’s company told me the they paid her directly b/c she told them my father had willed her everything ( not true). She basically pocketed the money and never told us or the court about it.