I would like to be a computer genius who could deduct a penny or so out of every millionaire’s (in the whole world) bank account every month. This crime, it could be argued, would harm no one, but would vastly help myself.

Unfortunately, I am not a computer genius. By the way, if someone commits the above-mentioned crime, I would be all in favor of prosecution. I am not saying that theft should not be punished. If any of you have read the book CATCH ME IF YOU CAN by Frank Abagnale, or seen the movie, you might be interested to learn that Abagnale today says that fraud is easier today than ever, due to computers. So, know ye where the criminals are.
Some of you have suggested that being a hit man might be a good criminal line to be in. But I remember how, in Calgary, a man who had done "hits" for a biker gang was murdered while he was stopping for gas near where I worked. It seems that a common first assignment for a new hit man is to murder the old hit man. Those who give the orders like to play it safe. That, by itself, all morality and humanity aside, would be enough to dissuade me from becoming a hit man.

Previously 1 prison sentence for fraud, presently on a 12 month suspended sentence for mortgage fraud and now been found guilty of benefit fraud for 4k. Served 3 months of the suspended on a tag and completed all 160 hrs community service. Has already served 8 weeks in prison whilst awaiting sentencing. No prosecution turned up twice and now the CPS r taking over the prosecution. What is likiest sentence?

http://www.island.lk/2009/12/15/news1.html
by the refusal to vote for persons and organizations that advocated and supported the detention and refusal to release civilians by LTTE forces?

http://www.colombopage.com/archive_091/Dec1260896331CH.html

As well as the prosecution of LTTE finance arms from abroad, especially as they relate to manipulating and defrauding international markets.

http://business.rediff.com/column/2009/dec/15/guest-why-billionaires-get-involved-in-frauds.htm

CHECK DRAFTS NOW CHANDRASIRI
Casimir – there is a huge difference between feeding, sheltering and providing education for 300K and using those same people as human shields which is what the LTTE did, they also killed people that were attemptoing to flee LTTE control. It is wise to rememnber that these almost 300K are the ones that made it out with full assistance from government forces whilsts other 3000 were killed by the LTTE. I am certainly glad that Rajaratnam is being held accountable for atleast part of his misdeeds.

http://www.colombopage.com/archive_091/Dec1260941456CH.html

You don’t find Fox omitting serious news like the Panthers being obstructed from Justice for intimidating Voters & polling places. The facts of the Plame case, which is the prosecution 1. Knew there was no crime 2. who exposed her and that it wasn’t a Bush administration guy 3. Told the guy who did expose Plame, (but not really because she wasn’t an operative recently enough for it to constitute a crime) to keep quiet while he went on a fishing expedition for 3 years ending right before the 2006 election and not stopping until he nailed a guy who had nothing to do with any of it for the crime of false statements about irrelevant activity 3 year before that had nothing to do with any crime, obviously done to affect the outcome of the election … the whole thing based on Wilson’s dirty trick which ended up being a fraud and officially uncovered as such, before the 2004 elections.

But the people watching the Pravda Media Conglomerate (Networks, Entertainment, Colleges, much of K-12 education is infected by Prog disinformation campaigns)

You don’t see that kind of crap out of Fox, they report all the news, which really pisses off those who are happy with it being obstructed on their behalf which is why they defame & smear Fox so people won’t listen to the one source that puts out the whole truth … that’s exactly it.

So why to the Progs continue to lie about Fox, describing Fox as the Pravda Media Conglomerate is, in all reality? What’s up with that?
Chewy, actually yes, there is documented evidence & witness by a democrat that those Black Panthers cause a number of people to turn away from the poles and not vote. A Clinton guy did a big article on it and is pissed at the Obama administration for what they did in Obstructing justice in that case. If you watched Fox in stead of lied about watching Fox, you’d know that.

I was on a sports site I often visit, wanted to see what I needed to do to sign up for something but didn’t put in any info, as I didn’t plan on buying anything. All of a sudden, a page comes up asking for my SSN. I know it’s some duplication page that tries to steal your indentity. I back out of the page and some WTS page comes up saying I was trying to commit "identity fraud" and claims to have my IP number. I didn’t put any of my info in at all, but I don’t want to see any prosecution letters in the mail either. I didn’t type anything at all in lol.

Two men who attempted to enter the United States using fraudulent methods were arrested by federal authorities in separate incidents, U. S. Customs and Border Patrol reported Wednesday.

Authorities said Sebastian M. Palacio, 20,a Colombian national who had previously been denied a visa to enter the U. S., was caught Monday at the Rainbow Bridge attempting to enter the country with another man’s passport.

Less than 24 hours later, Mirza Ballee, 34,a Guyanese citizen who had been previously deported from the U. S., was arrested at the Peace Bridge after he also allegedly presented a passport that was not his.

Palacio and Ballee were both charged with false statements and misuse of a passport. They were detained pending prosecution by the U. S. Attorney’s Office.

http://www.buffalonews.com/2010/06/24/1092711/two-charged-with-fraud-at-border.html

Mendi8a I thought you might offer to go there and offer to bail out the poor souls

ABC has many of thousands of employees and 10% "knew" that books were being illegally altered. Assuming the employees will tell the truth if offered amnesty from prosecution, what is the probability more than 30 out of 200 surveyed at random will admit to knowing about the fraud??
———————————————
answer key:

n= 200 p= 0.1
P(k>30) ~= P_Gaussian(X>30.5, mu=np, sigma=sqrt(npq))

np= 20
sqrt(npq)= 4.242640687

P(k>30) = P(z > 2.474873734 )=
0.5 – .4932= 0.0068

————————————————————————————
questions i have:
1) why do they use 30.5 ?
2) how do they calculate that z score?
3) i looked up that z score in the tables and its not the answer at all, how do they get that number? 4) why do they subtract from 0.5?

Why else would they back down when people refuse orders until they see the real birth certificate.

WND has reported that the controversy raises the prospect that the government ultimately may not want to pursue a prosecution because a defense attorney could demand in court proof that the orders are issued by an eligible president.

Even participants in a forum on the left-leaning Huffington Post website seemed to agree in part.

"Freakin’ Brilliant!" said one. "They can’t court-martial him [without] the defense getting the judge to order the the (sic) birth-certificate be produced! Either Obama will have to produce or they can’t prosecute. Genius." ….

…the case of (Major Stefan) Cook, the reservist who challenged his deployment orders over questions about their legality under Obama.

"Rather than contesting the suit," Day wrote, "the Army took the highly peculiar step of revoking the major’s deployment order, suggesting that the Pentagon generals are not entirely confident that they can demonstrate the legitimacy of their purported commander in chief.

"The Pentagon’s decision to back down rather than risk exposing Obama’s birth records to the public means that every single American soldier, sailor, pilot and Marine now holds a ‘get out of war free’ card. Not only every deployment order, but every order issued from an officer in the line of command can now be challenged in the knowledge that the top brass are afraid to respond for fear that their commander could be exposed for a fraud," he wrote at the time. …

ChargeBacks on Phone Sex?
hi
i just like advice on this can phonesex services really prosicute for under 0.00 of there services rendered.I made about 5 35.00 calls and my last call i got upset about it,so i disputed them all and change my mind so i un did the disputes and took it as it is what it was.the other day i got this following email:

hi xxxx,

I have not received any confimation from your bank that you reversed the charges. In fact, you filled another dispute that I got today. If I don’t have confimation within 48 hours my lawyer will be in contact with you.
We take fraud very seriously and if you refuse to pay your credit card bill for a valid charge, your fraudulent activity will be reported to all 3 major credit bureaus, and all information about your transaction will be turned over to the District Attorney in New York for prosecution. In addition, we submit all fraudulent orders to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). We cooperate fully with these agencies to ensure successful prosecution on these cases.

Regards,
xxxxxx
heres 1 more email ,i just got today

xxxxx,

I am a very busy person. I have not received anything from your bank or my merchant. I will get confirmation and I have yet to receive that.
The charges you owe are 5 plus additional 0 for charge back fees. They charge me per transaction. You owe 5 to ALD Consulting Services and if it’s not paid in FULL by tomorrow I will have no other choice but to hand this legal matter over to my attorney and this will be settled in court.

xxxxxx
yea what about if i have proof on my statement she was paid back for all calls

A man in court testified under oath that Obama and his wife were indeed at Obama’s Iraqi friend’s party.

"Obama’s name in Rezko trial
Levine says [Obama] attended bash for Iraqi crook "

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/rezko/894559,CST-NWS-rezko15.article

"Stuart Levine testified under cross-examination that Obama and his wife, Michelle, attended the April 3, 2004, reception for Nadhmi Auchi." … "Auchi — who lives in London — had been convicted of fraud in France in 2003. After visiting Chicago and Detroit in 2004, he wasn’t allowed back into this country in 2005, according to a prosecution filing in the Rezko case"… "The April 3, 2004, gathering for Auchi took place at Rezko’s mansion in Wilmette, with about 100 people attending, Levine testified."

Today a jury found Obama’s friend Rezko guilty of 16 counts in a corruption case.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080604/ap_on_re_us/fundraiser_trial

Obama lied about attending his Iraqi friend’s party.

"Obama’s name in Rezko trial
Levine says [Obama] attended bash for Iraqi crook "

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/rezko/894559,CST-NWS-rezko15.article

"Stuart Levine testified under cross-examination that Obama and his wife, Michelle, attended the April 3, 2004, reception for Nadhmi Auchi." … "Auchi — who lives in London — had been convicted of fraud in France in 2003. After visiting Chicago and Detroit in 2004, he wasn’t allowed back into this country in 2005, according to a prosecution filing in the Rezko case"… "The April 3, 2004, gathering for Auchi took place at Rezko’s mansion in Wilmette, with about 100 people attending, Levine testified."

Last week, a jury found Obama’s friend Rezko guilty of 16 counts in a corruption case.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080604/ap_on_re_us/fundraiser_trial

Obama is no longer in the clear. A witness contradicted what Obama said to federal investigators.
Lying to federal investigators is a felony. Many crooks have gone to jail for lying.

My friend gave me her credit card to buy some stuff for her she drinks alot and forgot I had had it. I charged10,0000.the bank wanted to file charges of cc fraud>my friend went down to the bank and signed off on any prosecution papers now her husband has threaten to to have me arrested in two days if I don’t pay in full plus 10 %.i have already paid 5,000.But at this point I don’t have any money.I was just wondering if she signed the papers at the bank can he now go back and prosecute?

I have two friends who have been convicted of conspiracy to commit securities fraud for stealing about million by selling underfunded securities. One of them, we’ll call him Steve Hallingham, had no prior criminal record, which the judge said was a "big plus" when he gave him a fairly light sentence of 18 months. But the other guy, call him, Theotis Watson, has a prior criminal conviction for stealing a spool of fishing line (monofilament, 20lb test, low-reflective) from the drug store when he was 17, and the prosecution is trying to make a big deal of this. Theo has a good story–he stole the fishing line so he could go fishing and bring home some dinner. Even at the time of his conviction the judge almost believed it, but in Florida, juveniles are charged as adults for any fishing-related crimes. But the prosecution in the securities case is trying to point out that if Theo’s motives were truly altrustic, why did he steal the 20lb not 12, and he purposely took the low reflective.
Anyway, Theo wants to argue that at the time when it happened, in the 70s, monofilament line was very cheap, even the 20lb/low reflective, and that it wasn’t until the 80s whenthe two major fishing line makers merged–possibly in violation of the antitrust laws–and were able to dominate the market–78% of all domestice fishing line is now made by a single maker–and drive up prices. In essence Theo wants to argue that 20lb test/low reflect might seem like a big deal now but it wren’t no thing in the 70s.

Anyway as a side strategy, Theo wants to get the fishing line conviction expunged on the basis of his clean record for many many years (until he stole the mil) and the fact that he has becme an accountant and is unlkely to commit similar crimes in the future as accountants do not require fishing line in their daily duties.

Any suggestions?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors) to see if his financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors) to see if his financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

a.a preliminary hearing in a murder trial
b.a misdemeanor traffic violation
c.a request for an equitable lien on property
d.a real estate fraud prosecution

Here is his strategy:
a. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
b. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down.

c. He’d screen carefully every person who wanted to place funds with him – To investigate the specific investor – He’d hire investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors. He wanted to see if the applicant’s financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, that plenty of monied people have, and they seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if these persons names surfaced as persons with claims against Madoff, then these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS. so Madoff had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators to protect themselves.
And as for the alleged “innocence” of his two sons. They knew plenty about it. Madoff didn’t want their lives destroyed by his evil, so it was agreed that when the matter was about to bust out, the sons would play the role of heroes unveiling Madoff so they would avoid prosecution.
Real nice family, isn’t it?

for example if you committed the fraud 15 years ago would you be immune to prosecution today?

individual "lazy employees" at ACORN, (which generated so many famous or phone book names in multiple states) have been convicted after being "turn[ed] … over to law enforcement for prosecution?"

"The problem for these lazy employees is that ACORN isn’t stupid and would flag the registration cards as suspect before turning them over to election officials. If they suspected fraud, they’d also turn those employees over to law enforcement for prosecution."

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Akd_umkKFhTjbd.kBEpmbmPsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20081017164126AAtpVP6

A) preliminary hearing in a murder trial
B) misdemeanor traffic violation
C) request for an equitable lien on property
D) a real estate fraud prosecution

i think its A but im really not sure. i just need a little help. thanks….

I just handled a phishing e-mail that indicated my PayPal password had been changed. It was almost identical to a real password change notification except it told you to go to a website and login with your old password. The e-mail came from service784@security-paypal.com. I checked and a real notification came from service@paypal.com.

The link in the letter looked like a paypal.com url, but, instead took you to http://www.paylowpal.com/ . I spoofed an e-mail and password and was taken to http://www.paylowpal.com/wbsc.php where I was asked to provide all of the info from my credit card to verify who I was.

I WHOIS’d security-paypal.com and it was registered to:
Organisation Name…. Howard Sams
Organisation Address. 310 pine valley bridgeville,pa.15017
Organisation Address.
Organisation Address. bridgeville
Organisation Address. 15017
Organisation Address. PA

I WHOIS’d paylowpal.com and it is registered to:
Organisation Name…. Qiang Chiung
Organisation Address. P O Box 99800
Organisation Address.
Organisation Address. EmeryVille
Organisation Address. 94662
Organisation Address. CA

I reported it as a phishing site to Microsoft (tools – Phishing Filter – Report This Website).

I forwarded the entire e-mail to PayPal at spoof@paypal.com.

I then forwarded the e-mail and other information to US-CERT (US Computer Emergency Readiness Team) at http://www.us-cert.gov/nav/report_phishi… .

It is easy to see that both paylowpal.com sites were phishing sites. First the domain name sounds wrong. Then, neither site was a secured site (they would have started with https:… .

I hope others take the time to report phishing. It may prevent others from being victimized and, hopefully, your actions might help to lead to the prosecution and conviction of the person(s) committing the fraud.
Edit: Thanks James. I actually posted this as a warning and to show people what you can do to protect yourself. This may be a new one because it passed Microsoft’s phishing filter.

The Castorena Leija-Sanchez crime organization is the major supplier of counterfeit documents/paper weapons in the United States. They are based in Mexico and have been operating in the United States for 17 years. They are in every major US city and earn approx.300 million dollars per year. They also deal in drugs and human smuggling. They are the new silent terrorists.

The following information on the site deals with the history of this terrorist group who they are, how they operate, and what is being done to expose them and bring them to justice.

Last but most important is the story of Suad Leija, the step daughter of the founder of this terrorist group. She has been assisting the government in their prosecution, identifying the key family members and giving the complete history from the beginning of this organization. You will see her early life as the organization grew. you will see her life as a young woman, you will see her life as she became the target of an effort to infiltrate her family to use their vast American computer database to track terrorists that have used the organization for counterfeit documents/paper weapons in the United States.

Until last year, the alleged connection between the Castorena and Leija-Sanchez families was relatively unknown. The link became clear in November, when ICE agents arrested Manuel Leija-Sanchez. It solidified when Suad arrived in the U.S. from Mexico earlier this year to assist U.S. agents in identifying family members.

STATISTICS

"The Castorena organization is suspected of making hundreds of millions of dollars a year in sales of fraudulent documents, ‘’said Dean Boyd, spokesman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Washington, D.C. "They typically charge between and 0 per document, depending on the quality.”

ICE agents have connected fraudulent documents made by the Castorenas’ to the Leija-Sanchez family. The two families have worked together since their organization got its start in Los Angeles in the mid-1980s.

"Back then, they were one of the few organizations to have industrialized printing presses,” Boyd said. "They had the card stock and the technology that allowed for mass production. Other organizations depended on them for the industrialized printing press, and that’s when their business started booming.”

• Based in Mexico

• 100 key members oversee cells of 10 to 20 individuals in cities across the United States

• Cells deal in document fraud, human smuggling and narcotics trafficking

• Documents were linked to more than 400 investigations and seizures in more than 50 cities in 33 states.

• American Express attributed million in losses to the family fraud business.

• In Denver, ICE investigations have led to the criminal prosecution of more than 50

For ICE Director of Investigations Marcy Forman, the Castorena-Leija organization, which can provide forged documents to terrorists intent on violating national security, is one of the largest and most sophisticated counterfeiter networks.http://www.paperweapons.net/paperintro.html

i have more than one account to conduct business or to just create accounts on websites is the email to be taken serious or should i just delte the extra accounts i have

This email serves to notify that your ip address has been linked to serveral email accounts including this one. Your search patterns and history are currently being reviewed and your email address(es) are being monitored. All activity from your ip address will be logged and can and may be used if prosecution is neccessary. We have noticed several fraud transactions originating from this ip address,this serves to notify you to cease and desist all illegal activities else your local fraud agency will be notified. We will continue to monitor and investigate your activity. I am etc;MR Thomas,Daniel

Why doesn’t the Senate Judiciary Committee subpoena John Ashcroft & Pete Domenci to put an end to the whole "Gonzalez-lied" myth. Quite simply these two men are the most key witnesses to this whole sham—Pete Domenici had a genuine belief that Cases of Voter Fraud were going unprsoecuted in a timely manner, like the recent prosecution of Acorn associates in Seattle (home of anothe fired Prosecutor) and Missouri (also home to a fired prosecutor).

In the forementioned Seattle case—the worst case of voter fraud in the state history—the fraud likely gave the Democrats the governorship (won last election by 133 votes after 3 recounts).

Its no wonder Pete Domenici throught something should be done fast—voter fraud should be acted on fast!!!! Plain and simple—no apologies!!!

As for John Ashcroft—were he to testify it would be come clear that Democrats are constructing myths in regard to the "hospital visit".
MUST READ:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110010400

.