Here is the story. My husband had a girld with a high school sweet heart. She was dating him and Guy "B". She got pregnant, told my husband it was his. Whe child was 2, my husband married her. She was still sleeping with Guy "B". my husband moved out of state, but he sent her monthly payments, that was not court ordered every month. Ten years later, she filed for divorce, and told my husband that they got a divorce. She sent him the papers that did not mention child support. But he continue to wire, and transfer her money every month through bank accounts. My husband married me, and his ex sent the child to live with him and myself for four years. His son told me that his mom had my husband on child support. My husband contacted her and she said "No", that I was lying and I was just trying to cause confusion. My concern was that if we are sending her 0 a month without a court order, then if there is a child support order, then I would rather send it through child support departments. After this his ex comes and picks up her son after four years, and take him to live with her. A month later, support kids call the house and the Attorney general of Texas sends a letter stating that ,000.00 is back child support is owed. My husband tries to tell them that he was never served with support papers, that a DNA was never done, and he had no idea that he was even on child support because he was never served, and it was not in their divorce papers. Support kids faxed him over some divorce papers, that had were nothing like the original papers that he received. These showed child support amounts and everything.

His ex had remarried, and her last name is lets say, "Smith". She married the other guy that she was involved with when they had originally got married, and the guy she was having an affair with that made them get a divorce in the first place. And to make matters worst. My husbands last name is, lets say, "Doe". Their son is not going by the name of "Doe-Smith". A combination of both of the guys last name. His son is now 19, and although my husband has tried to fight it because he was never served, and it is a possibility that it is the other man’s son, Texas Attorney General will even hear it. They are garnishing his wages, taking his taxes all for a child that may not be his, because of her lies. The divorce papers that were sent through support kids were a fraud, and I know it. The paperwork states that she wants her last name restored to "Smith". My question about that is, if my husband was your first husband, and your his last name was, "Doe". How can you get your last name restored to "Smith". Your maiden name is something else, Smith is the husband that you all have now. Is there any help for my husband.
The child is now 19, so he is paying arrears. He has been trying to fight this for years. They had joint custody, when the child lived with us for 4 years. As soon as she found out that he knew that he was on child support, she ran up here and swooped the child back up. That was two years ago. The child could be the other guys, that is why my husband left her to begin with, "She is a hore" And the child is now carrying an hypenated last name, my husbands, and the other possible father last name. I believe that support kids tampered with the divorce paperwork, because the original copy that my husband received does not state anything about child support. He gave her money and paid for all of his school activities, because he is a good father, and didn’t want CSE to dictate to him how much he needs to give to his son. He paid more per month then the order even stated.
I do not know how to reply to answers, so this is for DoNotBuy. Unfortunately, in the laws of my state, even if a man signs a birth certificate, if you were not married, when the child was born, a DNA test must be done. This was never done. I am not belittling her, I am just stating the facts of the case. The reason that I mentioned the fact of her last name is because those papers had to have been falsified, because it could not be possible that in the divorce papers from my husband, (her first husband), that she wants her name restored to her name that is her second husband, the man she is married to now. That is evidence to me that those papers have been falsified. I never said, "CSE falsified the documents" please read with an understanding before you make rude comments, this makes you look illiterate. I said, Support Kids, falsified those papers. It seems strange that CSE has not came after him at all for 18 years, if he had not paid, until those forged divorce papers surfaced.
The TX Attorney generals office told us to submit school records that proved that he lived with us, we did, not they said that it does not prove anythings, because although he lived with us in our state and we had proof from the school, such as Grade Cards, enrollment papers, discipline reports, letters from teachers and principals, it did not matter. The reason they changed their minds about this being proof of his residency is because, she continue to collect cash, foodstamp and other government assistance, in her state by stating that the child was still living with her for all of those years when he was not. We turned in receipts, showed bank transfers, money order receipts, canceled checks, and wire transactions receipts for all of those years to show that it was done monthly, but according to them, it was all gifts, and not considered child support. So basically, my husband is screwed, by a messed up system, that does not care about potential fraud.

My step daughter has gone insane after her mothers death. The both of us were named as executors of the will. She STOLE my copy of the most recent will,and I filed a report with the sheriff. The sheriff told me that "if" a copy of the other will could be produced,then charges could be laid, otherwise,at this time it’s just a civil case. My step daughter entered my house under false pretenses, when I wasn’t home, and stole my copy of the will,and then went and filed an earlier ‘version’ with the court. She also sued me to have me removed as executor because her layers did a background check on me. I have a felony from over 25 years ago. State law says I can be removed because of my record. The lawyer that did the wills for my wife refuses to help me. He said I must get a statement to release my late wife’s records, from my stepdaughter, because SHE is now the executor. If I go to the length to drag that creepy lawyer into court, I would then really want the step daughter charged with FRAUD and BURGLARY , and HARASSMENT. I’ve already been ‘banned’ from ever seeing the step-grand kids. They all call me "Gran-pa up-up". Not only did they lose their beloved grandma, now they are denied gram-pa up up as well. I have the FULL support of the other step children. (all of them are over 21)
How can I get the copies of the will, without having to charge my stepdaughter and her redneck husband with criminal ,charges?
I just want to have that will in my hands to SHUT HER THE FK UP!
I have some assets for a lawyer, but if I have to go there, she and her husband have to go to jail. Is that the only way?
I have several signed and notarized statements from witnesses as to the existence of the second will, and it’s provisions. That includes my wife’s sisters, my mother, and the minister that performed our marriage. Now she is refusing to provide the paperwork I need to complete the ‘SIMPLE ASSUMPTION’ so I can get the house transferred into my name. She says her lawyers say she can sell it. The mortgage is UNDERWATER ! She doesn’t care, she’s NUTS ! What can I do?
the house does belong to me, but in the ‘earlier’ version of the will, there is a clause that since we weren’t married, the house should be sold asap, and if it didn’t sell after 6 mos. , then I would have top battle it out with the Bank of America home loan dept. But after we were married, the UPDATED,STOLEN will gave me the house, and ALL the incoming insurance money from AFLAC. I really think handcuffs are gonna look good on her !
After the sale,any equity, if any, would be split fairly and legally. 50% for me, the other 50% split between the three adult kids.

What do you do when your robbed out of your inheritance by a step parent? When it’s family and they are commiting fraud and forgery against your elderly grandmother who is ill, Should you turn them into the cops? Or should you do nothing because it’s "family" and it will cause a huge family break down and turmoil? What would you do?

Let’s just say that doing nothing is not an option. OK

And that Obama-Care is a crappy option that will be hugely expensive, that will steal people’s Medicare Trust Fund, and that will only make a small dent in the problem of the Uninsured.

OK — those are just assumptions for the sake of argument, they are not final conclusions, they are just set up for my question, which is "What Could the Government fo Instead of Obama-Care?"

Here are some possibilities:

1. Very small Federal primary care clinics staffed by 3 or 4 doctors and supervised on a monthly basis by ultra-highly qualified doctors who visit every month or so to make sure the primary care is good or very good. These clinics would be operated on a "Good Samaritan" basis, and on a "Sovereign Immunity" basis, so if mistakes were made the Federal government could not be sued. It could however pay fair and reasonable compensation for gross negligence by the doctors it hired and supervised. Fair and reasonable would be decided by a formula, and by a panel of expert supervising physicians. So these primary care clinics would operated in a limited liability zone — not subject to local state jury trials for medical malpractice, and all patients seeking care in such clinics would have to knowingly sign a waiver of their right to sue. No waiver, no care, back out on the street, no Good Samaritan here to save you, try County General.

These little clinics should number about 10,000. They should basically be in the business of taking the primary care load off emergency rooms. They should do preventative medicine, and help clients get further care as needed. So your basic heart pills, and diabetes pills, and athsma treatments don’t have to be done for 00 in a busy emergecy room, they can be done for in a micro-clinic run by the Federal government. That’s a savings of 5 for each patient. Figure 20 patients a day, 300 days a year, pretty soon you’re talking real money (like 0,000 per year saved for each doctor on the staff). You could actually pay the doctors pretty well out of that saved amount, right? Let’s say 0,000 per year starting salary. You still clear 0,000 of societal savings for each doctor working.

This is all based on the idea that if the government wants there to be more healthcare, it should "just do it"

If the government wants the leaves raked off the White House lawn, it should "just do it"

The doing concept only seems strange in a world where the government has gotten used to writing 16,000 pages of detailed commands and instructions for anything it wants done — so that other people can do it.

I say skip the paperwork — if you want something done — do it! The Doing Concept, part of what made America great.

How about this idea for a second concept: Let the VA Pharmacy fill prescriptions for Vets based on the orders of the Vets’ own doctors, so long as those doctors are: (1) Board Certified (2) America Educated and (3) in Good standing as Physicians (their licenses are fully in operational and valid and current). So there’s no reason whatsoever to imagine that the Vets own doctor is not good enough to write the prescription. OK — then just fill it! It’s like the Just Do It concept.

Don’t fuss, don’t make the vet get a whole new doctor and come into your system, just let them have the benefit of government buying power, so the meds go out to the vet at about 20% of retail which is what the VA pays for them. The VA can charge for postage too.

Again this would be on a "Sovereign Immunity" "Malpractice Waiver" basis so the U.S. government would take no legal risk in this program. No chance of being sued. Fraud is still possible, but liability from lawsuits is not. The fraud can be squeezed out of the system by investigation and relentless prosecution of malfeasors — bad doctors who use their position to cheat Uncle Sam.

These are just two ideas. My basic idea is to take the problem down by layers, starting with the easy layers. More primary care — do it. More meds at fair prices — do it.

It’s the Doing Concept.

Over time this will make the problem smaller. Not vanish — but smaller. Instead of 45 million uninsurables — maybe in 10 years just 25 million. That’s way better than Obama-Care is likely to do. And at 10% of the cost of Obama-Care. And without stealing the Medicare Trust Fund.

It’s better policy because it’s a better value. It impacts the problem at low cost and low risk by using "doing" instead of "commanding" as its method of proceeding. Raking the leaves up, instead of writing a 16,000 page set of commands to get the leaves raked up. Doing — wow there’s a thought!
I have never watched FOX News. I have never read any FOX publication. I never listen to FOX radio.

Any resemblance between anything I say, and anything said on FOX is either coincidental or it arises from FOX people reading my posts (here and elsewhere) picking up the ideas, and making media talk with my ideas, without giving me credit for them, which I don’t mind. I’m with Rabidranath Tagore, the Indian poet, when he said, "Whatever isn’t given … is lost!" So pick my brain,, pick my bones .. it’s all given freely. But it is irritating when people think I get my ideas from FOX. It’s really unjust — a bad rap. The next person who says that should include a quote from FOX that is the paraphrase of what I say in my posts. You have to show that they said it first, then I said it second. Otherwise, I couldn’t possibly be getting my stuff from FOX, you see that, right? Just bring the quotes, or stop the bad rap. Thanks.

Several icons of the left appear to be signaling to Massachusetts voters that voter fraud would be justifiable.

On Friday, MSNBC’s Ed Schultz stated on his radio program that he personally would commit voter fraud if he lived in Massachusetts.

"Yeah, that’s right," he told his audience, "I’d cheat to keep these bastards out…. ’cause that’s exactly what they are."

Schultz even specified how he would distort the election result: By stuffing the ballot box, he said, and voting as many as 10 times.

Similarly, Hardball host Chris Matthews reminisced at length, and almost nostalgically, about the days when "street money" would be distributed by machine bosses in Massachusetts to motivate Democrat-friendly voters to turn out at the polls.

Several icons of the left appear to be signaling to Massachusetts voters that voter fraud would be justifiable.

On Friday, MSNBC’s Ed Schultz stated on his radio program that he personally would commit voter fraud if he lived in Massachusetts.

"Yeah, that’s right," he told his audience, "I’d cheat to keep these bastards out…. ’cause that’s exactly what they are."

Schultz even specified how he would distort the election result: By stuffing the ballot box, he said, and voting as many as 10 times.

Similarly, Hardball host Chris Matthews reminisced at length, and almost nostalgically, about the days when "street money" would be distributed by machine bosses in Massachusetts to motivate Democrat-friendly voters to turn out at the polls.

I work for a mortgage broker in Missouri. We are not lisenced in any other states, including Illinois. When we are contacted by customers in Illinois we submit the loan to the lender in another companies name. We have designated phone lines and email accounts for our "Illinois" company. I am concerned that I may be committing wire fraud if I continue originating these loans. If anyone has any information regarding this please share. Thanks.

I recently attended a consultation with my two sisters and mother with my Mom’s oncology team: seems there is a gene that she carries that could be hereditary, which would elevate our risk of cancer. Anyway, Four of us were present for this "consult"… no clinical work of any kind.
A couple weeks later I received a notice from my insurance company. The Oncology practice billed all three of our insurance companies, and medicare (mom) for a total of 24.00, for a "consultation" which lasted barely 45 minutes. I feel this is an outright abuse of the system. To what entity can I report this?

Please DON"T answer this unless you’ve actually typed or written a letter to your congress representative or senator. I’m curious to know what people are angry and concerned about these days on the average.

And if you haven’t, start exercising your democracy!!! Speak up! We’ve got illegal wars, military occupations, war profiteering, corporate fraud, complicity through weak journalism in our mainstream corporate media, and major injustice around the world. Exxon CEO’s are raking in 0 Million bonuses while millions starve in misery around the world. Palestinians are being oppressed and restricted economically with US weaponry and complicity. The US administration has lied over and over to us. We need more people to speak up! Get mad! Do something people!

martin: when "Jive Turkey" contributes to your campaign, and lives om "123 Main st", kinda looks like fraud, dudn’t it?!!!

I am no lawyer of criminal prosecutor so I need to know this:

In Canada, if you are charged with:
"fraud under 5000" and "fraud over 5000"

What are the penalties for each? (fines, prison/jail, etc)

My "con artist" ex-wife, deceived me from the very first day we started corresponding as to her intentions (I wanted a wife……..while she wanted to swindle me).

Since she already knew BEFORE she even inititated ANY correspondence with me that she was not legally entitled to come to the U.S.A. under any kind of Visa, (Moral Turpitude …….. Child Abuse/Neglect) that she might as well find a "mark" to steal from. With this kind of deception in her mind she used a marriage to me to assist her in her efforts to STEAL ME BLIND!!

But does this "bogus marriage" (on her part), also constitute Insurance Fraud under my Health Insurance Policy?? I mean it is supposed to be for my wife and children, but if the authorities declare her actions to be "Marriage Fraud" doesn’t that mean that the insurance benefits she received were also obtained under "FALSE PRETENSES"………..and therefore criminal "Insurance Fraud"?
I mean she obtained insurance benefits through HER acts of DECEPTION and victimized not only me (thousands of dollars), but also my insurance company (also into the thousands of dollars)?

I find it incredibly odd that they refer to the women that are treated at their clinics as "clients." Shouldn’t they be patients since they are receiving medical services?

Do they do that in order to give the client less rights, since along with the term "patients" comes a lot of rights?

How could someone sue them for medical fraud/negligence etc. if they are only a client?

The worlds worst driver is no longer insurable by anyone and is demanding to be added to my 40 year accident free insurance policy. I say that is outright insurance fraud.
She says that it’s not even remotely close to "fraud" and that I’m ignorant to the way things are done in the real world. I already know who’s right – the question is; what’s the nicest way to tell a friend "NO!" knowing that it will destroy her?
The plan she presented to me was to sign her car title over to me so that it looks like I just bought a second car. JEEZZZ.. how can anyone in their right mind think that’s NOT fraud.

I believe a prosecutor is engaging in selective prosecution. The equal protection doctrine requires that persons in similar circumstances must receive similar treatment under the law. To support a claim of selective prosecution, a defendant bears the burden of establishing unconstitutional discrimination in the administration of a penal statute. United States v. Gutierrez, 990 F.2d 472, 476 (9th Cir. 1993). A defendant must show both "(1) that others similarly situated have not been prosecuted, and (2) that the prosecution is based on an impermissible motive, i.e. discriminatory purpose or intent."

In this matter the prosecutor is not charging 3 people who committed mortgage fraud allowing a homeowner to pocket k cash and obtain a 0k loan while the loan officer and real estate broker make over k in unlawful commissions from the fraud. The prosecutor didn’t charge them even though he knew of their crimes nor did he notify the lender that a crime took place and they were defrauded. Mind you the prosecutor is special prosecutor for real estate fraud division. Instead the DA charged the one person that the criminals said absconded with part of the funds from the mortgage fraud. I believe this proves that other similarly situated people have not been prosecuted for some reason.

Additionally, the prosecutor has engaged in willful misconduct against the only defendant in the case such as contacting their employer threatening to do a press release and naming the employer if the defendant’s wasn’t fired, and sending over copies of the complaint to their employer which are both direct violation of the DA’s office regulations and policy. This should show that the DA has a particular bias against the defendant for some reason as he has never done that before in his career.

Would this be along the lines of proving selective prosecution? What else would need to be shown in order to prove selective prosecution?
As a response to Mr. Placid:

Thank you for your comment. However in United States v. Berrios, 501 F. 2d 1207, 1211 (2d Cir 1974), the Court described the second prong as requiring a showing that "the government’s discriminatory selection of him for prosecution has been invidious or in bad faith, i.e., based upon such impermissible considerations as race, religion or the desire to prevent his exercise of constitutional rights."

by reading the court’s decision, it appears that selective prosecution doesn’t have to be based on a protected catergory but rather invidious or in bad faith actions by the prosecutor. In this particular case, the DA contacted the defendant’s employer, threaten a press release naming the employer if the defendant wasn’t fired and sent over the complaint which is against policy. Doesn’t this constitute invidious actions on the part of the DA. In order to obtain a motion for discovery of additional documentation to prove the selective prosecution, the
As a response to Mr. Placid:

Thank you for your comment. However in United States v. Berrios, 501 F. 2d 1207, 1211 (2d Cir 1974), the Court described the second prong as requiring a showing that "the government’s discriminatory selection of him for prosecution has been invidious or in bad faith, i.e., based upon such impermissible considerations as race, religion or the desire to prevent his exercise of constitutional rights."

By reading the court’s decision, it appears that selective prosecution doesn’t have to be based on a protected catergory but rather invidious or in bad faith actions such as using race. In this particular case, the DA contacted the defendant’s employer, threaten a press release naming the employer if the defendant wasn’t fired and sent over the complaint which are invidious acts. Doesn’t this constitute impremissible actions on the part of the DA? In order to obtain a motion for discovery of additional documentation to prove the selective prosecution, the
defense must only show colorable bias. The colorable basis standard "permits discovery when the defendants introduce some evidence tending to show the essential elements of selective prosecution and the government fails to explain it adequately." Id. at 1514

If during discovery it can be shown that the DA has never contacted an employer of a defendant before, didn’t prosecute other criminals involved in the matter who admitted in open court and to the DA during the investigation of committing real estate fraud, and the DA has been proven willful misconduct by attempting to get the defendant fired then wouldn’t that be proof of true selective prosecution and grounds for a dismissal?

Is this true?

"The first misconception that most people have is that the Federal Reserve Bank is a branch of the US government. IT IS NOT. THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE COMPANY. Most people believe it is as American as the Constitution. THE FACT IS THE CONSTITUTION FORBIDS IT’S EXISTENCE. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have the power to create money and regulate the value thereof, NOT A BUNCH OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS! Today the FED controls and profits by printing WORTHLESS PAPER, called money, through the Treasury, regulating its value, AND THE BIGGEST OUTRAGE OF ALL, COLLECTING INTEREST ON IT! (THE SO-CALLED NATIONAL DEBT). The FED began with approximately 300 people or banks that became owners, stockholders purchasing stock at 0 per share- the stock is not publicly traded) in the Federal Reserve Banking System. They make up an international banking cartel of wealth beyond comparison. The FED banking system collects billions of doll"

In todays Guardian, Polly Toynbee states that:
"Nigel Farage admits legally drawin £2m in EU expenses and employing his wife, while one of his MEPs was jailed for benefit fraud and another faces prosecution for laundering money and false accounting on his EU expenses"
EDIT: Just found out that the two disgraced UKIP MEPs are getting large 6 figure pensions too. Just like all the other MEPs. Still not seeing any difference….
EDIT: Just found out that the two disgraced UKIP MEPs are getting large 6 figure pensions too. Just like all the other MEPs. Still not seeing any difference….

There is a neighbor who has been on assistance from time to time who has a better lifestyle than everyon else, owns a business yet appears to get subsidies. Her mothr owns the home and "rents" to her. She does the same with another child who freely admits to being purposely on welfare. It appears as if the taxpayers migt be paying for these houses.

My husband’s profile (very basic info, no pictures, etc) showed up on 2 "free" dating sites, but he can’t figure out how they got there. Can someone obtain your ip address and sign you up based on general info you might have on another website?

I recently won a judgment for a fraud case. My lawyers are preparing a "Journal Entry of Judgment". What is this?

No and neither would anyone else.
So I have to wonder why you or anyone else would take advice on the science of Evolution and Biology from a man who’s "diploma" was bought from a diploma mill.
I’m talking about the infamous "Dr." Dino aka Kent Hovind.
His "degree" is not only NOT in sciences but in something called "christian education" (an oxymoron if I ever heard one) but from a "university" with no accreditation.
But for some reason, some of you STILL quote this guy, clearly not understanding that he has NO understanding of the actual Science behind Evolution.
Once you do find a Scientist who’d credentials are credible and real, and who DOES dispute the Science of Evolution (good luck with that) then your arguments might stand up to even casual scrutiny.
Until then though, we will continue to regared people like Kent and Kirk Cameron as ill-informed idiots, who are simply trying to steer people away from reality and into the churches (where, surprise, surprise, the collection plate will be ready and waiting for them).

any problem? I think they’ve got the "to hell with the law" thing down pat!!

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/09/10/who-wants-to-open-a-brothel-funding-available/#comments

http://www.rottenacorn.com

With ALL This VOTER FRAUD how do we know that McCain didn’t actually win?

I recently bought a SmarTrip card on craigslist – the seller showed me the value of the card (0) and I used it for a few weeks and then it deactivated with 0 left on it.

I’m afraid to phone in the problem because I think I just purchased someone’s smartbenefits. Which, according to the back of the card, "is subject to arrest/prosecution." But I don’t want them to get away with this so they’ll do it to someone else – how do I report them to the proper authorities anonymously?

Normal version.

RRe

Link Roll

iroll
Mind roll
1. Inappropriate question which I list as INP.
2. Profanity

3. Sexual content
4. Swearing(Only if it is being used as an insult or in excess.)
5. Violence or images with bad depicts or sexuality.
6. Someone asks for contact(I usually leave a comment instead or it may be better to email the person.)
7. Chatting(This of little concern because it is not really a problem.)
8. Rants(eiwbfiuibfiefbibifbfeb)
9. A question that is (clearly) not a question.
10. Repeat posts
11. Posting in too many capital letters.
12. Off topic post
13. A person offers points.
I usually do not report:
1. Long posts
2. Religious posts
3. Poems
4. Personal posts
5. Political posts
6. "Am I pretty" questions get deleted (if they have sexual profanity) or have appeared before. Please note: There can be many other reasons why.
7. A person may have a second account.(People usually start second accounts because of computer errors.)
Please try to follow these guidelines.

http://answers.yahoo.com/info/community_…

if keyboard_check_released(vk_left)
hspeed=0
sprite_index=spr4_aristandingstraight
image_speed=0
if keyboard_check_released(vk_right)
hspeed=0
sprite_index=spr3_aristandingstraight
image_speed=0
rules:
1.Spam/ads
2.Ranting
3.Profanity
4.Misrepresentation
5.Chatting
6.Violent depictions
7.Phishing
8.Harrasment
9.Fraud
10.Imperisonation
11.Avatar violations
12.Excessive symbols
13.Harm to Minors
14.Insults
15.Adult content
16.Offering points
17.Illegal material
18.Repeat questions
19.Trolling
20.Multiple accounts
21.Wrong catagory
22.Being mean, hateful or absene.
Your Answer:
If you go to another website, that means you are being a coward and a cannot fight the spammers and report maniacs on this forum. All te cowards leave YA and gather together in a hippie huddle and with and atagonists, superspammers, HACKERS. YA is a challenge to be the best literal advice giver. Remember that is potential the best answers website on the net. Check my contacts and you will find some report maniacs.
You can ask question, but make SURE you read ALL the rules carefully. Yahoo moderation has low toleratance for broken rules. You lose points for the following:
1. -10 points-question violation
2. -12 points-answer violation
3. -5 points-Asking a question
4. -2 points-Delete a question
You can get your account suspended if you gather many violations.
Common violations to watch out for.
1. Chatting: Asking a question directly to specific members or solitications.

http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/answers…

2. Posting in all caps. This is a form of spam. Limit the amount of capitals you use.
3. Excessive symbols: Limit them or do not make them distracting. They are not the biggest problem, but people are often unaware of this.
4. Avatar violations: Sexual Profanity, Violant images, inapprioate nicknames, and excessive symbols will be reported.
5. Statments: Vague questions and statments that are not asking questions can sometimes be a form of spam and disrupt the community.
6. Insults: Direct swearing and hurtful insults always get reported immediately.
7. Sexual Profanity
8. Spam ads
9. Rants(qdowhoiqfoihfoifhwoiq)
Read the Yahoo guidelines carefully.

http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/uto…

http://answers.yahoo.com/info/community_…

http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/answers

You can appeal here, but if you fail your appeal then you will lose more points.…
Pokémon♪♫
Pokémon♪♫
Pokémon♪♫

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-L-QPuqe…

Information about object: object1

Sprite: spr3_aristandingstraight
Solid: false
Visible: true
Depth: 0
Persistent: false
Parent: <no parent>
Mask: <same as sprite>

Create Event:
execute code:

image_speed=0.8

Step Event:
execute code:

if position_empty(0,1)
gravity=0.5
if keyboard_check_released(vk_right)
sprite_index=spr3_aristandingstraight
if keyboard_check_released(vk_left)
sprite_index=spr4_aristandingstraight

if vspeed is larger than 12
set variable vspeed to 12
if y is larger than 480
jump to the start position

Collision Event with object obj_hblock:
execute code:

move_contact_solid(direction,-1)
vspeed=0

Keyboard Event for <no key> Key:
execute code:

if keyboard_check_released(vk_left)
hspeed=0
if keyboard_check_released(vk_right)
hspeed=0

Keyboard Event for <Left> Key:
execute code:

keyboard_check_pressed(vk_left){
sprite_index=spr2_arismovingl
hspeed=-8
}

Keyboard Event for <Up> Key:
if relative position (0,1) gives a collision with Only solid objects
set the vertical speed to -10

Keyboard Event for <Right> Key:
execute code:

keyboard_check_pressed(vk_right){
sprite_index=spr1_arismovingr
hspeed=8
}
New age cyberspace123
Zapdos! Control Alt Delete.
y_answrs_editors@yahoo.com
☻☼☺
THE ABOVE: Is code take from an actually video game I made.
1.

ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS

Yahoo! I
LOL!!!!!!!!!!

First he betrays a phony working class image that he has honed for years by selling out to KMart and then he gives one of the lamest Super Bowl performances ever. It was simultaneously hilarious and embarrassing like when your uncle gets drug at the family cookout and forgets that he is old as hell. Prince showed why he has been the greatest live act for the last 30 years at the Super Bowl. Bruce showed he doesn’t have it anymore and may have never had it when it comes to being genuine.
I have seen Led Zep and Prince is better
ONly the dumbest arsehole goes with that "walked his walk" bullsheet.